Momo — More Monitoring Action in the EU
Momo — More Monitoring Action in the EU

Self-evaluate your campaign

Campaigning Engagement Monitoring the common good

Time

90 min

Group size

5-30

Applicable to
digital tools

YES by external softwares

Difficulty

Rated 4 out of 5

Time

90 min

Group size

5-30

Applicable to digital tools

YES by external softwares

Difficulty

Rated 4 out of 5
This activity allows us to assess the effectiveness of the campaign being conducted and to focus on possible problems and, moreover, it stimulates the search for collective solutions. This activity can be proposed several times during the campaign as well as at the end to assess the quantitative and qualitative levels achieved.
Instructions
This activity allows us to assess the effectiveness of the campaign being conducted and to focus on possible problems and, moreover, it stimulates the search for collective solutions. This activity can be proposed several times during the campaign as well as at the end to assess the quantitative and qualitative levels achieved.
Instruction

THEORY OF REFERENCE

Call to action 4 – step 10

GOALS

Assessing the campaign process

AGE OF PARTICIPANTS

13 years old

METHODS

One minute paper, consensus approach

EQUIPEMENT

Cardboards, paper sheets, markers, laptop, video projector and internet connection to share the factsheet

MATERIALS

Not provided

ESCAPE GAME

For an immersive experience of this topic, check out our Escape Game!
Momo — More Monitoring Action in the EU

Instructions

  • Divide the participants into groups and ask them to collectively reflect (and write on a sheet of paper) the actions undertaken and results reached until that moment by the monitoring community, following these questions (20 min):
    • Which actions/results have been achieved?
    • Which have not been?
    • Why?
    • What have been the problems, or difficulties internal of the groups that prevented the objectives from being achieved?
    • What have been the problems, or difficulties external to the groups that prevented the objectives from being achieved?
  • Then ask each group to try to identify possible collective solutions to every difficulty and problem. Ask them to write them on a different sheet of paper (20 min)
  • Ask every group to present the results and proposals to the plenary (20-30 min)
  • The proposals can be modified or negotiated in plenary to obtain solutions shared by the whole group (20 min)
N.B. Do not blame individuals for any shortcomings, as the whole process takes place collectively and is therefore the whole community’s responsibility. One should always think in terms of collective solutions and all proposals should be constructive. This attitude is intended to make everyone feel free to ask the community for help to improve their efforts or change their role.

POSSIBILE VARIATION

Not provided

DIGITAL TOOLS

Digital tools you can consider:

  • Use a video conferencing tool like Zoom, or any other platform that supports online meetings and breakout rooms.

  • By using online collaborative whiteboard platforms like Jamboard. Miro, Mural, you can carry out the brainstorming session with the students – each group can work on a separate slide of the jamboard covering one of the five questions of the activity. After the brainstorming they can slide to the other jamboard sheets and see the answers of the other groups.

  • By using the same online collaborative whiteboard platforms, each of the 5 groups can work on its proposals for overcoming the challenges and present them to the others.

Momo — More Monitoring Action in the EU